summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/busybox/docs/busybox.net/license.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'busybox/docs/busybox.net/license.html')
-rw-r--r--busybox/docs/busybox.net/license.html135
1 files changed, 135 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/busybox/docs/busybox.net/license.html b/busybox/docs/busybox.net/license.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..14324f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/busybox/docs/busybox.net/license.html
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+<!--#include file="header.html" -->
+
+
+<h3>The GPL BusyBox license</h3>
+
+There has been some confusion in the past as to exactly what is
+required to safely distribute GPL'd software such as BusyBox as
+part of a product. To ensure that there is no confusion
+whatsoever, this page attempts to summarize what you should do to
+ensure you do not accidentally violate the law.
+
+<p>
+<h3>Complying with the BusyBox license is easy and completely free.</h3>
+
+U.S. and International Law protects copyright owners from the unauthorized
+reproduction, adaptation, display, distribution, etc of copyright protected
+works. Copyright violations (such as shipping BusyBox in a manner contrary to
+its license) are subject to severe penalties. The courts can award up to
+$150,000 per product shipped without even showing any actual loss by the
+copyright holder. Criminal penalties are available for intentional acts
+undertaken for purposes of "commercial advantage" or "private financial gain."
+In addition, if it comes to my attention that you are violating the BusyBox
+license, I will list you on the <a href="/shame.html">BusyBox Hall of Shame</a>
+webpage.
+
+<p>
+
+Nobody wants that to happen. Do everyone a favor and don't break the law -- if
+you use BusyBox, you <b>must comply with the BusyBox license</b>.
+
+<p>
+<h3>BusyBox is licensed under the GNU General Public License</h3>
+
+BusyBox is licensed under the GNU General Public License , which
+is generally just abbreviated as the GPL license, or
+just the GPL.
+<p>
+<a href="/products.html">Anyone thinking of shipping
+BusyBox as part of a product</a> should be familiar with the
+licensing terms under which they are allowed to use and
+distribute BusyBox. You are advised to take a look over the
+
+<ul>
+<li><a href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html">full text of
+the GNU General Public License</a>, and
+<li><a href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html">
+Frequently Asked Questions about the GNU GPL</a>
+</ul>
+to be sure you (and your lawyers) fully understand them.
+
+<p>
+
+The following is a quick summary for the impatient. If you
+carefully follow these steps, it will ensure that you are 100%
+authorized to ship BusyBox with your product, and have no reason
+to worry about lawsuits or being listed on the <a
+href="/shame.html">BusyBox Hall of Shame</a> page. You will be
+able to sleep peacefully at night knowing you have fulfilled all
+your licensing obligations.
+
+<p>
+
+If you distribute a product, it should either be accompanied by
+<b>full source for all GPL'd products</b> (including BusyBox)
+and/or a <b>written offer</b> to supply the source for all
+GPL'd products for the cost of shipping and handling. The source
+has to be in its preferred machine readable form, so you cannot
+encrypt or obfuscate it. You are not required to provide full
+source for all the closed source applications that happen to be
+part of the system with BusyBox, though you can certainly do so
+if you feel like it. But providing source for the GPL licensed
+applications such as BusyBox is mandatory.
+
+<p>
+
+<b>Accompanied by source</b> generally means you distribute the full
+source code for all GPL'd products including BusyBox along with your
+product, such as by placing it somewhere on a driver CD. Full source
+code includes the BusyBox ".config" file used when your shipping BusyBox
+binary was compiled, and any and all modifications you made to the
+BusyBox source code.
+
+<p>
+
+<b>A written offer</b> generally means that somewhere in the
+documentation for your product, you write something like
+
+<blockquote>
+The GPL source code contained in this product is available as a
+free download from http://blah.blah.blah/
+</blockquote>
+Alternatively, you can offer the source code by writing
+somewhere in the documentation for your product something like
+<blockquote>
+If you would like a copy of the GPL source code contained in this
+product shipped to you on CD, please send $9.99 to &lt;address&gt;
+which covers the cost of preparing and mailing a CD to you.
+</blockquote>
+<p>
+
+Keep in mind though that if you distribute GPL'd binaries online (as is often
+done when supplying firmware updates), it is <b>highly</b> recommended that you
+make the corresponding source available online at the same place. Regardless,
+if you distribute a binary copy of BusyBox online (such as part of a firmware
+update) you <b>must</b> either make source available online (i.e.
+<b>accompanied by source</b>) and/or inform those downloading firmware updates
+of their right to obtain source (i.e. <b>a written offer</b>). Failure to do
+so is a violation of your licensing obligations.
+
+
+<p>
+
+Some people have the mistaken understanding that if they use unmodified
+GPL'd source code, they do not need to distribute anything. This belief
+is not correct, and is not supported by the
+<a href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html">text of GPL</a>.
+Please do re-read it -- you will find there is no such provision.
+If you distribute any GPL'd binaries, you must also make source available
+as discussed on this webpage.
+
+<p>
+<h3>A Good Example</h3>
+
+These days, <a href="http://www.linksys.com/">Linksys</a> is
+doing a good job at complying with the GPL, they get to be an
+example of how to do things right. Please take a moment and
+check out what they do with
+<a href="http://www.linksys.com/download/firmware.asp?fwid=178">
+distributing the firmware for their WRT54G Router.</a>
+Following their example would be a fine way to ensure that you
+have also fulfilled your licensing obligations.
+
+
+<!--#include file="footer.html" -->
+