From 7daa076d3e24e84ce1f4e9b6133783816575c4c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Andersen
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 07:46:08 +0000
Subject: egor duda writes:

Hi!

I've created a patch to busybox' build system to allow building it in
separate tree in a manner similar to kbuild from kernel version 2.6.

That is, one runs command like
'make O=/build/some/where/for/specific/target/and/options'
and everything is built in this exact directory, provided that it exists.

I understand that applyingc such invasive changes during 'release
candidates' stage of development is at best unwise. So, i'm currently
asking for comments about this patch, starting from whether such thing
is needed at all to whether it coded properly.

'make check' should work now, and one make creates Makefile in build
directory, so one can run 'make' in build directory after that.

One possible caveat is that if we build in some directory other than
source one, the source directory should be 'distclean'ed first.

egor
---
 testsuite/du/du-l-works | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'testsuite/du/du-l-works')

diff --git a/testsuite/du/du-l-works b/testsuite/du/du-l-works
index c5d4398..61e9140 100644
--- a/testsuite/du/du-l-works
+++ b/testsuite/du/du-l-works
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
-du -l .. > logfile.gnu
-busybox du -l .. > logfile.bb
+[ -n "$d" ] || d=..
+du -l "$d" > logfile.gnu
+busybox du -l "$d" > logfile.bb
 cmp logfile.gnu logfile.bb
-- 
cgit v1.1