From aaffef4d338f6f3d554eb0428e572ebbd5e00476 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Landley Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 01:44:29 +0000 Subject: Start of developer documentation for busybox. --- docs/busybox.net/programming.html | 179 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 179 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/busybox.net/programming.html (limited to 'docs') diff --git a/docs/busybox.net/programming.html b/docs/busybox.net/programming.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e44f291 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/busybox.net/programming.html @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ + + +
Busybox aims to be the smallest and simplest correct implementation of the +standard Linux command line tools. First and foremost, this means the +smallest executable size we can manage. We also want to have the simplest +and cleanest implementation we can manage, be standards +compliant, minimize run-time memory usage (heap and stack), run fast, and +take over the world.
+ +Busybox is like a swiss army knife: one thing with many functions. +The busybox executable can act like many different programs depending on +the name used to invoke it. Normal practice is to create a bunch of symlinks +pointing to the busybox binary, each of which triggers a different busybox +function. (See getting started in the +FAQ for more information on usage, and the +busybox documentation for a list of symlink names and what they do.) + +
The "one binary to rule them all" approach is primarily for size reasons: a +single multi-purpose executable is smaller then many small files could be. +This way busybox only has one set of ELF headers, it can easily share code +between different apps even when statically linked, it has better packing +efficiency by avoding gaps between files or compression dictionary resets, +and so on.
+ +Work is underway on new options such as "make standalone" to build separate +binaries for each applet, and a "libbb.so" to make the busybox common code +available as a shared library. Neither is ready yet at the time of this +writing.
+ + + +The directory "applets" contains the busybox startup code (applets.c and +busybox.c), and several subdirectories containing the code for the individual +applets.
+ +Busybox execution starts with the main() function in applets/busybox.c, +which sets the global variable bb_applet_name to argv[0] and calls +run_applet_by_name() in applets/applets.c. That uses the applets[] array +(defined in include/busybox.h and filled out in include/applets.h) to +transfer control to the appropriate APPLET_main() function (such as +cat_main() or sed_main()). The individual applet takes it from there.
+ +This is why calling busybox under a different name triggers different +functionality: main() looks up argv[0] in applets[] to get a function pointer +to APPLET_main().
+ +Busybox applets may also be invoked through the multiplexor applet +"busybox" (see busybox_main() in applets/busybox.c), and through the +standalone shell (grep for STANDALONE_SHELL in applets/shell/*.c). +See getting started in the +FAQ for more information on these alternate usage mechanisms, which are +just different ways to reach the relevant APPLET_main() function.
+ +The applet subdirectories (archival, console-tools, coreutils, +debianutils, e2fsprogs, editors, findutils, init, loginutils, miscutils, +modutils, networking, procps, shell, sysklogd, and util-linux) correspond +to the configuration sub-menus in menuconfig. Each subdirectory contains the +code to implement the applets in that sub-menu, as well as a Config.in +file defining that configuration sub-menu (with dependencies and help text +for each applet), and the makefile segment (Makefile.in) for that +subdirectory.
+ +The run-time --help is stored in usage_messages[], which is initialized at +the start of applets/applets.c and gets its help text from usage.h. During the +build this help text is also used to generate the BusyBox documentation (in +html, txt, and man page formats) in the docs directory. See +adding an applet to busybox for more +information.
+ +Most non-setup code shared between busybox applets lives in the libbb +directory. It's a mess that evolved over the years without much auditing +or cleanup. For anybody looking for a great project to break into busybox +development with, documenting libbb would be both incredibly useful and good +experience.
+ +Common themes in libbb include allocation functions that test +for failure and abort the program with an error message so the caller doesn't +have to test the return value (xmalloc(), xstrdup(), etc), wrapped versions +of open(), close(), read(), and write() that test for their own failures +and/or retry automatically, linked list management functions (llist.c), +command line argument parsing (getopt_ulflags.c), and a whole lot more.
+ +To add a new applet to busybox, first pick a name for the applet and +a corresponding CONFIG_NAME. Then do this:
+ +The standard we're paying attention to is the "Shell and Utilities" +portion of the Open +Group Base Standards (also known as the Single Unix Specification version +3 or SUSv3). Note that paying attention isn't necessarily the same thing as +following it.
+ +SUSv3 doesn't even mention things like init, mount, tar, or losetup, nor +commonly used options like echo's '-e' and '-n', or sed's '-i'. Busybox is +driven by what real users actually need, not the fact the standard believes +we should implement ed or sccs. For size reasons, we're unlikely to include +much internationalization support beyond UTF-8, and on top of all that, our +configuration menu lets developers chop out features to produce smaller but +very non-standard utilities.
+ +Also, Busybox is aimed primarily at Linux. Unix standards are interesting +because Linux tries to adhere to them, but portability to dozens of platforms +is only interesting in terms of offering a restricted feature set that works +everywhere, not growing dozens of platform-specific extensions. Busybox +should be portable to all hardware platforms Linux supports, and any other +similar operating systems that are easy to do and won't require much +maintenance.
+ +In practice, standards compliance tends to be a clean-up step once an +applet is otherwise finished. When polishing and testing a busybox applet, +we ensure we have at least the option of full standards compliance, or else +document where we (intentionally) fall short.
+ +