Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-15 | shell/math: fix parsing of ?: and explain why it's parsed that way | Denys Vlasenko | |
This fixes arith-precedence1.tests. This breaks arith-ternary2.tests again (we now evaluate variables on not-taken branches). We need a better logic here anyway: not only bare variables should not evaluate when not-taken: 1 ? eval_me : do_not_eval but any (arbitrarily complex) expressions shouldn't evaluate as well! 1 ? var_is_set=1 : ((var_is_not_set=2,var2*=4)) function old new delta evaluate_string 1097 1148 +51 Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> |