diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | networking/nslookup.c | 28 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/networking/nslookup.c b/networking/nslookup.c index 5aa2b35..c43ad46 100644 --- a/networking/nslookup.c +++ b/networking/nslookup.c @@ -349,6 +349,8 @@ static int parse_reply(const unsigned char *msg, size_t len) header = (HEADER *)msg; if (!header->aa) printf("Non-authoritative answer:\n"); + else if (option_mask32 & OPT_debug) + printf("Non-authoritative answer:\n" + 4); if (ns_initparse(msg, len, &handle) != 0) { //printf("Unable to parse reply: %s\n", strerror(errno)); @@ -381,7 +383,7 @@ static int parse_reply(const unsigned char *msg, size_t len) return -1; } inet_ntop(AF_INET6, ns_rr_rdata(rr), astr, sizeof(astr)); - /* bind-utils-9.11.3 uses the same format for A and AAAA answers */ + /* bind-utils 9.11.3 uses the same format for A and AAAA answers */ printf("Name:\t%s\nAddress: %s\n", ns_rr_name(rr), astr); break; #endif @@ -580,7 +582,7 @@ static int send_queries(struct ns *ns) printf("Address:\t%s\n\n", auto_string(xmalloc_sockaddr2dotted(&ns->lsa->u.sa)) ); - /* In "Address", bind-utils-9.11.3 show port after a hash: "1.2.3.4#53" */ + /* In "Address", bind-utils 9.11.3 show port after a hash: "1.2.3.4#53" */ /* Should we do the same? */ } @@ -640,12 +642,26 @@ static int send_queries(struct ns *ns) printf("*** Can't find %s: Parse error\n", G.query[qn].name); G.exitcode = EXIT_FAILURE; break; - - case 0: - printf("*** Can't find %s: No answer\n", G.query[qn].name); - break; + /* bind-utils 9.11.25 just says nothing in this case */ + //case 0: + // break; } } +/* NB: in case of authoritative, empty answer (NODATA), IOW: one with + * ns_msg_count() == 0, bind-utils 9.11.25 shows no trace of this answer + * (unless -debug, where it says: + * ------------ + * QUESTIONS: + * host.com, type = AAAA, class = IN + * ANSWERS: + * AUTHORITY RECORDS: + * ADDITIONAL RECORDS: + * ------------ + * ). Due to printing of below '\n', we do show an additional empty line. + * This is better than not showing any indication of this reply at all, + * yet maintains "compatibility". I wonder whether it's better to break compat + * and emit something more meaningful, e.g. print "Empty answer (NODATA)"? + */ bb_putchar('\n'); n_replies++; if (n_replies >= G.query_count) |