diff options
| author | Matt Kraai | 2001-10-30 23:11:20 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Matt Kraai | 2001-10-30 23:11:20 +0000 |
| commit | 3889078dbe09a9d85b359e9c0c0c225e0bbea343 (patch) | |
| tree | e258582c0f14f06750e480e2c244260e79860fd0 /testsuite/TODO | |
| parent | 999623e9736d21177d1f437679b334e0347a6e0f (diff) | |
| download | busybox-3889078dbe09a9d85b359e9c0c0c225e0bbea343.zip busybox-3889078dbe09a9d85b359e9c0c0c225e0bbea343.tar.gz | |
Merge test suite.
Diffstat (limited to 'testsuite/TODO')
| -rw-r--r-- | testsuite/TODO | 23 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/testsuite/TODO b/testsuite/TODO new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2412631 --- /dev/null +++ b/testsuite/TODO @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +This testsuite is quite obviously a work in progress. As such, +there are a number of good extensions. If you are looking for +something to do, feel free to tackle one or more of the following: + +Buildroot support + Erik has put together a handy package for constructing and + testing busybox called buildroot. Integrating this into + the testsuite would allow for greater test coverage (e.g., + init, mount, and other privileged applications). + +BB_FEATURE support + BusyBox contains a number of features which are controlled + by compile-time defines. A method to run tests based on + these features would be great. + +libbb unit testing + Being able to test the functions of libbb individually may + help to prevent regressions. + +Standardization + This testsuite is totally bastardized. It would be better + to use an existing test framework, such as dejagnu, greg, + or a XUnit clone (shunit?). |