diff options
author | Mark Whitley | 2000-11-17 21:28:39 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mark Whitley | 2000-11-17 21:28:39 +0000 |
commit | 9028e2c96aa2e8a863c8ad9aa3e870fc160f1c23 (patch) | |
tree | f7141748a3e82bd013163e218c9d744b9dd4d2a0 /docs/style-guide.txt | |
parent | a683ee81d918f338a8335d4f03057106b701afec (diff) | |
download | busybox-9028e2c96aa2e8a863c8ad9aa3e870fc160f1c23.zip busybox-9028e2c96aa2e8a863c8ad9aa3e870fc160f1c23.tar.gz |
Numerous spelling / grammar corrections from Larry Doolittle
<ldoolitt@recycle.lbl.gov>, as well as a few additions / clarifications.
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/style-guide.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/style-guide.txt | 79 |
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/docs/style-guide.txt b/docs/style-guide.txt index 72d3b93..36974d7 100644 --- a/docs/style-guide.txt +++ b/docs/style-guide.txt @@ -21,11 +21,12 @@ Declaration Order Here is the order in which code should be laid out in a file: + - commented program name and one-line description - commented author name and email address(es) - commented GPL boilerplate - - commented description of program + - commented longer description / notes for the program (if needed) - #includes and #defines - - const and globals variables + - const and global variables - function declarations (if necessary) - function implementations @@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ This is everybody's favorite flame topic so let's get it out of the way right up front. -Tabs vs Spaces in Line Indentation +Tabs vs. Spaces in Line Indentation ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The preference in Busybox is to indent lines with tabs. Do not indent lines @@ -56,7 +57,7 @@ multi-line comments that use an asterisk at the beginning of each line, i.e.: Furthermore, The preference is that tabs be set to display at four spaces wide, but the beauty of using only tabs (and not spaces) at the beginning of -lines is that you can set your editor to display tabs at *watever* number of +lines is that you can set your editor to display tabs at *whatever* number of spaces is desired and the code will still look fine. @@ -76,7 +77,7 @@ Put spaces between terms and operators. Example: While it extends the line a bit longer, the spaced version is more readable. An allowable exception to this rule is the situation where excluding the spacing makes it more obvious that we are dealing with a - single term (even if it is a compund term) such as: + single term (even if it is a compound term) such as: if (str[idx] == '/' && str[idx-1] != '\\') @@ -89,12 +90,20 @@ Bracket Spacing ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If an opening bracket starts a function, it should be on the -next line with no spacing before it. However, if a bracet follows an opening +next line with no spacing before it. However, if a bracket follows an opening control block, it should be on the same line with a single space (not a tab) -between it and the opening control block statment. Examples: +between it and the opening control block statement. Examples: Don't do this: + while (!done) + { + + do + { + + Don't do this either: + while (!done){ do{ @@ -121,7 +130,7 @@ is being declared or called). Examples: while (foo) { for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { - Do functions like this: + But do functions like this: static int my_func(int foo, char bar) ... @@ -131,8 +140,8 @@ is being declared or called). Examples: Cuddled Elses ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -Also, please "cuddle" your else statments by putting the else keyword on the -same line after the right bracket that closes an 'if' statment. +Also, please "cuddle" your else statements by putting the else keyword on the +same line after the right bracket that closes an 'if' statement. Don't do this: @@ -151,25 +160,36 @@ same line after the right bracket that closes an 'if' statment. stmt; } +The exception to this rule is if you want to include a comment before the else +block. Example: + + if (foo) { + stmts... + } + /* otherwise, we're just kidding ourselves, so re-frob the input */ + else { + other_stmts... + } + Variable and Function Names --------------------------- Use the K&R style with names in all lower-case and underscores occasionally -used to seperate words (e.g. "variable_name" and "numchars" are both +used to separate words (e.g., "variable_name" and "numchars" are both acceptable). Using underscores makes variable and function names more readable because it looks like whitespace; using lower-case is easy on the eyes. Note: The Busybox codebase is very much a mixture of code gathered from a -variety of locations. This explains why the current codebase contains such a -plethora of different naming styles (Java, Pascal, K&R, just-plain-weird, +variety of sources. This explains why the current codebase contains such a +hodge-podge of different naming styles (Java, Pascal, K&R, just-plain-weird, etc.). The K&R guideline explained above should therefore be used on new files that are added to the repository. Furthermore, the maintainer of an existing -file that uses alternate naming conventions should -- at his own convenience --- convert those names over to K&R style; converting variable names is a very -low priority task. Perhaps in the future we will include some magical Perl -script that can go through and convert files--left as an exersize to the -reader. +file that uses alternate naming conventions should -- at his own convenience -- +convert those names over to K&R style; converting variable names is a very low +priority task. Perhaps in the future we will include some magical Perl script +that can go through and convert files -- left as an exercise to the reader for +now. Tip and Pointers @@ -177,31 +197,34 @@ Tip and Pointers The following are simple coding guidelines that should be followed: - - When in doubt about the propper behavior of a busybox program (output, + - When in doubt about the proper behavior of a Busybox program (output, formatting, options, etc.), model it after the equivalent GNU program. Doesn't matter how that program behaves on some other flavor of *NIX; doesn't matter what the POSIX standard says or doesn't say, just model - busybox programs after their GNU counterparts and nobody has to get hurt. + Busybox programs after their GNU counterparts and nobody has to get hurt. - Don't use a '#define var 80' when you can use 'static const int var 80' - instead. This makes the compiler do typechecking for you (rather than + instead. This makes the compiler do type checking for you (rather than relying on the more error-prone preprocessor) and it makes debugging - programs much easier since the value of the variable can be easily queried. + programs much easier since the value of the variable can be easily + displayed. - If a const variable is used in only one function, do not make it global to the file. Instead, declare it inside the function body. - Inside applet files, all functions should be declared static so as to keep - the global namespace clean. The only exception to this rule is the + the global name space clean. The only exception to this rule is the "applet_main" function which must be declared extern. - If you write a function that performs a task that could be useful outside the immediate file, turn it into a general-purpose function with no ties to any applet and put it in the utility.c file instead. - - Put all help/usage messages in usage.c. Put other strings in messages.c - (Side Note: we might want to use a single file instead of two, food for - thought). + - Put all help/usage messages in usage.c. Put other strings in messages.c. + Putting these strings into their own file is a calculated decision designed + to confine spelling errors to a single place and aid internationalization + efforts, if needed. (Side Note: we might want to use a single file instead + of two, food for thought). - There's a right way and a wrong way to test for sting equivalence with strcmp: @@ -218,7 +241,9 @@ The following are simple coding guidelines that should be followed: The use of the "equals" (==) operator in the latter example makes it much more obvious that you are testing for equivalence. The former example with - the "not" (!) operator makes it look like you are testing for an error. + the "not" (!) operator makes it look like you are testing for an error. In + a more perfect world, we would have a streq() function in the string + library, but that ain't the world we're living in. - Do not use old-style function declarations that declare variable types between the parameter list and opening bracket. Example: |