diff options
author | Denys Vlasenko | 2013-07-27 14:35:51 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Denys Vlasenko | 2013-07-27 14:35:51 +0200 |
commit | ad546ec6062e47f08352ff2c4038aba3479bfb82 (patch) | |
tree | 1609675e80b08330d39c7c10908a1a1b7e2edd0c | |
parent | 9078633feeb129d679c97d900807ef2d5b253b65 (diff) | |
download | busybox-ad546ec6062e47f08352ff2c4038aba3479bfb82.zip busybox-ad546ec6062e47f08352ff2c4038aba3479bfb82.tar.gz |
Update docs/tcp.txt
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
-rw-r--r-- | docs/tcp.txt | 19 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/docs/tcp.txt b/docs/tcp.txt index 7951e1c..c867c6d 100644 --- a/docs/tcp.txt +++ b/docs/tcp.txt @@ -39,11 +39,28 @@ Solution #1: block until sending is done: close(sock); Solution #2: tell kernel that you are done sending. -This makes kernel send FIN, not RST: +This makes kernel send FIN after all data is written: shutdown(sock, SHUT_WR); close(sock); +However, experiments on Linux 3.9.4 show that kernel can return from +shutdown() and from close() before all data is sent, +and if peer sends any data to us after this, kernel stll responds with +RST before all our data is sent. + +In practice the protocol in use often does not allow peer to send +such data to us, in which case this solution is acceptable. + +If you know that peer is going to close its end after it sees our FIN +(as EOF), it might be a good idea to perform a read after shutdown(). +When read finishes with 0-sized result, we conclude that peer received all +the data, saw EOF, and closed its end. + +However, this incurs small performance penalty (we run for a longer time) +and requires safeguards (nonblocking reads, timeouts etc) against +malicious peers which don't close the connection. + Defeating Nagle. |